Episode 23 — Audit and Accountability — Part Three: Evidence, coverage checks, and pitfalls
Evidence for audit and accountability controls verifies that logging, review, and retention processes are functioning as described. Candidates preparing for the exam must understand that this evidence includes configuration files, sample log records, alert screenshots, and review reports. Coverage checks confirm that all required systems and components generate the expected logs. A common pitfall is assuming that enabling default logging provides sufficient visibility; in reality, scope and depth must match mission and risk. Another recurring issue is failure to document log review frequency or reviewer identity, which weakens accountability. Strong audit evidence connects technical settings with procedural compliance.
Operationally, organizations maintain evidence repositories where auditors can trace logs to controls and events to outcomes. Automated coverage scans detect systems not forwarding logs or missing critical event categories. Review meetings and documented checklists demonstrate ongoing analysis and remediation. When pitfalls like log overflow or misconfigured time sources occur, corrective actions must be recorded to preserve audit integrity. Understanding how to collect and present this evidence ensures professionals can defend their audit frameworks against both technical and procedural scrutiny. Produced by BareMetalCyber.com, where you’ll find more cyber audio courses, books, and information to strengthen your educational path. Also, if you want to stay up to date with the latest news, visit DailyCyber.News for a newsletter you can use, and a daily podcast you can commute with.
